After the first iteration of the wireframes, we identified several areas that require improvement based on the initial testing. Users struggled to follow the process, despite having clearly outlined steps, suggesting a lack of intuitive guidance that hindered their ability to proceed confidently and efficiently. Additionally, users expressed a need for the ability to select data at multiple levels, such as partial or full data sets, as the current lack of flexibility led to inefficiencies and frustration. During the review phase, users had difficulty differentiating and validating their partial and full data selections, which increased the likelihood of errors and created uncertainty. Furthermore, users were unable to determine which module was currently being processed, leading to confusion, especially when managing multiple modules simultaneously. Lastly, when failures occurred during multi-module copying, users struggled to undo or retry operations for specific modules, which disrupted workflows and required additional effort to resolve partial failures. These insights highlight key areas for refinement in the next iteration of the design.